The authoritative presentation of a leading evaluation approach, this book describes the cipp context, input, process, and product models origin, concepts, and procedures. This approach to evaluation focuses on theoretical rather than methodological issues. Educational program evaluation using cipp model neliti. This provides a systematic way of looking at many different aspects of the curriculum development process. Pdf there are many models of evaluation that can be used to evaluate a program. The cipp model has the following strengths and limitations.
Sep 19, 2015 the cipp acronym represents the four basic concepts of the model. These approaches, in varying degrees, are unique and cover most program evaluation efforts. The cipp model for program evaluation springerlink. The cipp acronym represents the four basic concepts of the model. The cipp models considers four factors in evaluation context, input, process, product from which it derives its name. Cipp evaluation model developed by stufflebeam and shinkfield in 1985. Cipp evaluation model checklist stufflebeam provides an explanation of what cipp is, and a checklist designed to help evaluators evaluate programs with relatively longterm goals. Need to study alternative approaches the study of alternative evaluation approaches is important for professionalizing program evaluation and for its scientific advancement and operation.
This checklist, patterned after the cipp model, is focused on program evaluations, particularly those aimed at effecting longterm, sustainable improvements. This chapter illustrates and explains the cipp models correct, effective application based on an 8. Director, collaborative assessment and program evaluation services, university of florida for over 15. Ultimately, the foundation used the evaluation both to assure the projects success and to strengthen the. Cipp is a decisionfocused approach to evaluation and emphasises the. The model was not designed with any specific program or solution in mind. The cipp evaluation model was originally developed to provide timely information in a systematic way for decision making, which is a proactive application of evaluation. However, the most commonly used is the context, input, process, output cipp evaluation models. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the evaluation scale developed by the researcher based on the principles of stufflebeams cipp evaluation model 1988 within the context of the evaluation of english curriculum of yildiz technical university. Also, it is generally consistent with a wide range of. Cipp evaluation model checklist, a tool for applying the cipp model to assess longterm enterprises. Daniel stufflebeam created the cipp model in 1966 to evaluate federally funded projects and it. Sunil kalekar adhyapak mahavidyalaya, aranyeshwar, pune 9 cipp model is a popular model for curriculum evaluation given by stufflebeam. One very useful approach to educational evaluation is known as the cipp, or context, input, process, product approach, developed by stufflebeam 1983.
Evaluation theory, models, and applications, 2nd edition. It arose from the observation that traditional approaches to evaluation designs were found to be l nd often too rigid for evaluating dynamic social conteimited a. However, the most commonly used is the context, input. Philosophy and code of ethics underlying the cipp model 314. The evaluation context is used to give a rational reason a selected program or curriculum to be. The cipp model of evaluation developed by daniel stufflebeam is a decisionoriented evaluation. The cipp evaluation model was developed by daniel stufflebeam in the 1960s. Input evaluation evaluasi masukan tahap kedu dari model cipp adalah evaluasi input, atau evaluasi masukan. Unlike many models, cipp provides for feedback throughout a program. The cipp evaluation model is a comprehensive framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and systems. Evaluation theory, models, and applications, 2nd edition wiley. The purpose of this study was to evaluate educational quality at schools using stufflebeams cipp evaluation model 1983. These four components of the cipp evaluation model are designed to provide a holistic view of the success of instructional initiatives. Two of the approaches, reflecting the political realities of evaluation, are often used illegitimately to falsely characterize a programs value and are labeled pseudo.
The basic idea is to use the programs rationale or theory as the basis of an evaluation to understand the programs development and impact smith, 1994, p. Pdf implementation of cipp model for quality evaluation at. In this model, the context, input, process, product cipp model is recommended for the program evaluation processes of modern businesses in contradiction to all of these models. Stufflebeam provides an explanation of what cipp is, and a checklist designed to help evaluators evaluate programs with relatively longterm goals. Using the cipp framework to define evaluation questions 319.
The cipp model provides a comprehensive framework on h ow to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching model, what aspects should be considered and who should be involved. Cipp model for curriculum development and evaluation. The cipp evaluation model see figure 1 is a framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and evaluation systems stufflebeam, 2003. Using the cipp model to assess nursing education program. Cipp evaluation model the model was proposed by stufflebeam in 1983. The cipp model of evaluation developed by daniel stufflebeam is a decisionoriented evaluation approach designed to help those in charge of administering programs to make sound decisions.
Cipp is an acronym for context, input, process and product. Evaluator activities clientstakeholder activitiesprogram planning identify and investigate existing programs that could serve as a model for the contemplated program. That model stufflebeam, 1966 was developed in the late 1960s as one alternative to the views about evaluations that were most prevalent at that time those oriented to objectives, testing, and experimental design. By developing a plausible model of how the program is supposed to work, the evaluator. Model cipp merupakan model evaluasi yang komplek dalam memperoleh data sebuah program. Based upon cipp model, the proposed evaluating items are identified in the followings. Evaluation denotes the monitoring of progress towards desired goals and objectives. Stufflebeams ipp evaluation model the cipp acronym stands for context, input, process, and product. No other evaluation model has had as strong and lasting an impact as the cipp model, and this book offers the first comprehensive guide. The cipp evaluation model has some weaknesses, too. Models of curriculum evaluation university of kwazulunatal. A faculty development project designed to support the teaching and evaluation of professionalism of med. In the last post, we began a discussion on evaluation models of the scientific variety. Jun 10, 20 the cipp evaluation model see figure 1 is a framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and evaluation systems stufflebeam, 2003.
It was evident from the results that the scale called cipp evaluation scale cipp as a valid and reliable curriculum evaluation. A prerequisite for evaluation is the development of a project plan with measurable objectives that are logically related to one another and to the goals and. Eric ed062385 the relevance of the cipp evaluation model. The authoritative presentation of a leading evaluation approach, this book describes the cipp context, input, process, and product model s origin, concepts, and procedures. There is a risk, however, that it may be directed only by. Application of context input process and product model in. Stufflebeams ipp evaluation model defining evaluation.
The cipp model effectively guided a program evaluation assessing the contexts, inputs, processes, and products of eol education within a prelicensure nursing program. Pdf cipp evaluation model checklist semantic scholar. Cipp is an acronym for context, inputs, process, and product. Cipp model context, input, process, product sage research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate educational quality at schools. In other words, it enables decisionmakers to track the. Pdf educational program evaluation using cipp model.
Pdf implementation of cipp model for quality evaluation. This chapter illustrates and explains the cipp model s correct, effective application based on an 8. The cipp evaluation model by stufflebeam, daniel l. Download pdf show page numbers the cipp model for evaluation is a comprehensive framework for guiding formative and summative evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and systems. The authors believe that the model can be effectively applied for school evaluation. Cipp model for evaluation the cipp model was devised by guba, and further developed by stufflebeam, in the 1960s. The utilization of the cipp model in this evaluation, as well as in extant literature, supports its flexibility and utility for program evaluations. Implementation of cipp model for quality evaluation at.
Input evaluation input evaluation assesses competing strategies and the work plans and budgets of the selected approach. Like the original form, the results of factor analysis indicated that the cipp evaluation model scale had four factors consisting of context, input, process and product and consisted of 46 items. This article 1 explores the cipp evaluation model s theoretical roots and applications, 2 delineates its four components, 3 analyzes each components role in a servicelearning projects. Cipp model the cipp model is a social systems model applied to program evaluation. Matthews and hudson 2001 developed guidelines for the evaluation of parent training projects within the framework of the cipp evaluation model. Model evaluasi cipp context, input, process, product tama. Stufflebeams model is called the cipp model which stands for context input process product. In this post, we conclude are look at scientific evaluation models by examining stufflebeams cipp model.
Stufflebeam harold and beulah mckee professor of education and distinguished university professor western michigan university. These four components of the cipp evaluation model are designed to provide a holistic view. Methods and models for evaluating instructional experiences. Pdf implementation of cipp model for quality evaluation at school. Menurut eko putro widoyoko, evaluasi masukan membantu mengatur keputusan, menentukan sumbersumber yang ada, alternative apa yang diambil, apa rencana dan strategi untuk mencapai tujuan, dan bagaimana prosedur kerja untuk mencapainya. Doc cipp model for curriculum development and evaluation. Its comprehensive approach to evaluation can be applied from program planning to program outcomes and fulfillment of core values.
This chapter presents the cipp evaluation model, a comprehensive framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions. Formative and summative uses of context, input, process, and product evaluations 3. Context evaluation is the assessment of the environ. David miller, phd, professor and director, human development and organizational studies in education. Stufflebeam harold and beulah mckee professor of education and distinguished university professor western michigan university presented at the 2003 annual conference of the oregon program evaluators network open. This chapter presents the cipp evaluation model, a comprehensive framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and evaluation systems. Also, it is generally consistent with a wide range of program. Evaluation goals actions process evalua western michigan universiy the evaluation center evaluation checklist project. This article examines whether the cipp model also serves the retroactive purpose of providing information for accountability. Cipp evaluation model is a program evaluation model which was developed by daniel stufflebeam and colleagues in the 1960s. Designed as a multifaceted approach evaluation, the cipp model provides a comprehensive framework for conducting both. A potential weakness of this model is the evaluators occasional inability to respond to some significant questions or issues. Cipp is an evaluation model that requires the evaluation of context, input, process and product in judging a programmes value. These are four distinct types of evaluation, and they all can be done in a single comprehensive evaluation or a single type can be done as a standalone evaluation.
The cipp model is also practitionercentric and it is useful for both formative as well as summative evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the evaluation scale developed by the researcher based on the principles of stufflebeams cipp evaluation model 1988. Cipp model is an evaluation model for curriculum evaluation given by stufflebeam in 1983 which includes four elements. Implementation of cipp model for quality evaluation at school. The cipp evaluation model is a comprehensive framework for guiding evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and. In planning evaluation procedures, evaluators need to consider the resources and time available. The reasons for giving preference to the cipp model may be briefly expressed as follows. Download pdf show page numbers the cipp model for evaluation is a comprehensive framework for guiding formative and summative evaluations of programs, projects, personnel, products, institutions, and. There are many models of evaluation that can be used to evaluate a program. Nov 20, 2010 input evaluation evaluasi masukan tahap kedu dari model cipp adalah evaluasi input, atau evaluasi masukan. This book is an uptodate, practical rendition of the. Daniel stufflebeam is a famous educator and evaluator of curriculum. Context evaluation input evaluation process evaluation product evaluation these components are or can be viewed as separate forms of evaluation, but they can also be viewed as steps or stages in a comprehensive evaluation. Extracting actionable results from a projects results can be challenging.
830 1278 1309 1021 513 1227 508 1580 1489 817 466 939 1476 212 905 424 1502 304 377 1322 343 471 661 1605 770 1152 205 1046 1342 1182 198 891 1024